Love Clarity is all you need

Writing a declaration for a nation requires extreme clarity. Not just vague ideas about “We want to help people. We want to make people’s lives better.” But clearly, what problem are you solving? And is that a problem that people are aware of? And how are you going to talk about that problem so that people can understand it, see their place in it, and be motivated to want to get involved?

We’re still in the process of writing and refining Treacy’s declaration. We hit yet another roadblock this week when we realized that we didn’t have a way to explain what we were doing without resorting to overused language.

So I might as well share the background with where our thought process has been going, so that this all makes sense. Here is the progression of how we’ve understood the problem, from the beginning of the month to now:

Treacy is…

  • 01/02/12: a family lifestyle photographer who wants to make a difference beyond her backyard
  • 01/04/12: a photographer who is gifted at bringing out the best in family relationships and capturing real moments on film
  • 01/09/12: a photographer who is concerned about self-image and how that affects relationships
  • 01/18/12: a photographer who wants to fix disconnected family relationships (“family” meaning anyone that we have loyal, intimate relationships with)
  • 01/20/12: a photographer who believes that disconnected family relationships are caused by people keeping an internal “record of wrong” for themselves and for the members of their family
  • 01/27/12: a photographer who believes that the only way to change the disconnectedness of these family relationships is by keeping a record of right; replacing old assumptions about who we are and who other people are with the truth

And so we arrived at the problem. A big, giant, change-the-world problem. A problem worth solving.

Our first idea around this was that people could submit to voluntary brainwashing. Because Julianne and I are a bit rebellious, we loved this idea and really pushed for it. I mean sure, brainwashing has a negative connotation…but if it’s voluntary? I would totally sign up.

But it wasn’t Treacy’s thing. She couldn’t grab a hold of it, because it seemed a little on the negative side. Totally un-Treacy-like.

So then we started thinking about keeping a Record of Right. (And hey…recordofright.com is available! But oh wait…it looks like record o’ fright. Which is an entirely different thing.) But it felt very clinical, and it was hard to get excited about, without the context of “keeping a record of wrong”. Even in that context, it just wasn’t hitting it.

So you can see the challenge. We’ve known what the Great Good essentially is for a few weeks now, but explaining it in a way that isn’t trite or benign has been the struggle. So on Tuesday, Jules, Cali, Treacy, and I were having another brainstorming session.

We put it out there on Twitter…

And then later…

Always count on Kenneth to provide the best responses:

A few of the other, more normal responses:

We almost gave up and decided to go the route of the 50s housewife:

Obviously, we weren’t there yet. But yesterday, it clicked. We had the epiphany we were looking for. (Which reminds me of a joke I need to make up…how many epiphanies does it take to build a nation? I just need a punchline.) And so at this very moment, Treacy’s diligently working on her declaration, and then we’ll all refine it and sign it. And share it with you. Hooray!

(Oh yes, for more about why we’ve structure nation-building the way we have, check this out.)

5 Responses to Love Clarity is all you need

  1. Kelvin Kao says:

    Treacy is… a description that grows longer and longer every day, it seems.

  2. Christianne says:

    Loved reading this! Especially loved reading the progression of understanding who Treacy is until you all landed at something that could change the world. Thanks again for sharing this process with us.

  3. I know this stuff tends to get really abstract as that’s where the most creative ideas are had. However, I’m not sure what you mean by brainwashing. Are you still talking about family portraits or is Treacy wanting to segue into developing a product that meets this need? Or, does she plan to revise her services altogether, like including a therapy-session-meets-photo-shoot sort of experience?

    I think the way you guys are striving to build brands on meaning/mission more than anything else is really awesome– no one else is doing it like this. I guess I’m just curious how you plan to tie this sort of sentiment into how her business operates. Probably a post in itself really!

    • sarahjbray says:

      It really is! We’ve got so many ideas for content, products, and services that will solve the problem. We’re spending the next few weeks doing research and making decisions about which of those we’re going to focus on. We’ll probably be launching with one scalable solution that will help Treacy to serve the world, and one local, one-on-one solution that will help Treacy serve face-to-face. Both of those will include photography in some way, since that’s the way she sees the world. Then we’ll experiment and ideally continue to refine them, adding new things from our stock of ideas over time.

Leave a reply

"You can choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know."
– William Wilberforce